File Amicus Briefs in Property Rights and Taking Cases

Owners’ Counsel lawyers have been and continue to be involved in significant property rights cases in nearly every state and every jurisdiction nationwide. OCA lawyers have either represented property owners directly or OCA itself has participated in the filing of Amicus Briefs in many of the property takings and property rights cases that have been considered by the United States Supreme Court over the past forty years, including:

  • Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979);
  • Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255 (1980);
  • First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987);
  • Nollan v. Cal. Coastal Comm’n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987);
  • Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (1992);
  • Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992);
  • Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994);
  • Preseault v. ICC, 494 U.S. 1 (1986);
  • City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., 526 U.S. 687 (1999);
  • Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001);
  • Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg’l Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 (2002);
  • San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005);
  • Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005);
  • Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005); and
  • Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 129 S. Ct. 365 (2008).

Process For Requesting an Amicus Brief

OCA’s primary focus is on eminent domain, inverse condemnation and regulatory taking matters, with a particular focus on “right to take” and “just compensation” claims. If you believe that OCA’s voice can aid in the resolution of your case, contact our office at (877) 367-6963 to speak with OCA’s Executive Director.

Recent Amicus Briefs

August 21, 2020

Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC v. Hawaii Land Use Commission

No. 20-54

Developer Bridge Aina Le‘a, LLC, purchased a large tract of land in Hawaii  to build hundreds of new homes. Before the company ever got the chance, however, the Hawaii Land Use Commission re‐designated the land for agricultural use, effectively preventing any  residential development from occurring.

more info

August 11, 2020

Christus Lutheran Church of Appleton v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation

No. 2018-AP-1114

In this case currently before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, OCA addresses important issues arising out of a pre-litigation “jurisdictional” offer made to Christus Church by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation that contained compensation for severance damages to the Church’s

more info

June 29, 2020

Johnson v. City of Suffolk

Record No. 191563

In this case currently before the Virginia Supreme Court, Virginia oystermen claim that a Sanitation District and the City knowingly operated a sewage and stormwater system in such a way as to discharge wastewater into the Nansemond River, invading oyster beds being leased by the oystermen from the state for the express purpose of oyster cultivation

more info

April 15, 2020

Lech v. City of Greenwood Village

No. 19-1123

After being chased by police for stealing clothing from a Walmart, a man barricaded himself in a house in Greenwood Village, Colorado. Over a 19 hour period, using explosives and a battering ram attached to an armored personnel carrier, the local police department’s SWAT team intentionally destroyed the landowner’s house to force the fugitive to surrender.

more info

June 21, 2019

Knick v. Township of Scott

588 U.S.

In Knick, the U. S. Supreme Court agreed that property owners are entitled to enforce their right to just compensation in federal court in situations where governmental entities take their property in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

more info

in the news

close