OCA Blog

July 31st, 2008 — In News & Events

Tulsa, OK might use eminent domain for new Drillers ballpark

Tulsa World staff writer P.J. Lassek writes today about Mayor Kathy Taylor's proposed $60 million baseball stadium and mixed use project for the historic Greenwood District. Although the city, as the Tulsa Development Authority, already owns the land where the stadium would be built, it does not own the surrounding real estate, which would be desirable if a larger mixed-use facility was designed for the site. Mr. Lassek writes...

Read More

Sharing is caring!

July 29th, 2008 — In News & Events

Jaxport Opts Out of Eminent Domain Taking After Jury Verdict of $67 Million

JACKSONVILLE, FL, Jul 29, 2008 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) -- After almost two years in litigation, the Board of the Jacksonville Port Authority (Jaxport) has decided to abandon the eminent domain taking of Keystone Coal Company's 70-acre property on the St. Johns River.

Read More

Sharing is caring!

July 29th, 2008 — In News & Events

Property Owner Awarded $2.8M in St. Louis

A St. Louis jury recently awarded property owner Bill Simon of Alton, Illinois, $2,871,200 for the 2 acres of land he owned just north of the Edward Jones Dome in downtown St. Louis. Simon purchased the property in 1999 for $523,000 as an investment. Attorney Paul Henry explained "He bought it because the area had potential."

Read More

Sharing is caring!

July 28th, 2008 — In News & Events

OCA’s Mission

With this our first blog post, we would like to explain our goals as an organization and what we intend to discuss in this blog. Owners' Counsel of America (OCA) is an organization which has sought to bring together the most experienced eminent domain attorneys in the country as a resource to each other in the defense of private property ownership. OCA members stand at the forefront of property...

Read More

Sharing is caring!

July 1st, 2008 — In Articles

“The Perils of Prior Appraisal” by Michael Rikon (New York)

In this 2008 article, Mr. Rikon supports New York's two-step appraisal law for inverse condemnation but cautions against requesting draft appraisals since they are admissible at trial and may create problems by undermining the credibility of the appraiser.

Read More

Sharing is caring!

July 1st, 2006 — In Articles

“Compensation for Loss of Visibility to and View from the Owner’s Property” by James L. Thompson (Maryland)

The general law covering this issue (related to inverse condemnation) varies from state to state. The authors cite numerous case examples in this 2006 article, including their current litigation, and organize the disparities into three categories: legal principles, collateral factors and practice tips.

Read More

Sharing is caring!

July 1st, 2005 — By  Mark M. Murakami — In Articles

“Recent Developments in Public Use and Pretext in Eminent Domain” by Robert H. Thomas (Hawaii)

By Mark M. Murakami

The courts response to the increasing number of landowners challenging government condemnation is examined in this 2005 article. The issue of pretext is illustrated by litigation in Hawaii involving a private property owner's claim that the county had delegated its power of eminent domain to a developer.

Read More

Sharing is caring!

June 1st, 2005 — By  Jeff Tibbals — In Articles

“The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain Law” by Keith M. Babcock and Brady R. Thomas (South Carolina)

By Jeff Tibbals

The elasticity of South Carolina's legal interpretation of public use is the focus of this article. The South Carolina cases cited are from Jasper County and the cities of Charleston and Columbia. The landmark Kelo v. City of New London case is discussed, as well as select cases from Michigan and Hawaii.

Read More

Sharing is caring!